17/9/ · Essay Sample: The death penalty, also referred to as capital punishment is a legal course of where the state sends a death row inmate to execution as a punishment for a +1 () Free essaysEstimated Reading Time: 9 mins Essays on Death Penalty. Capital punishment has existed ever since humans started to form the first communities. What is surprising is that it has not yet been abolished in many parts of the world, and it is a matter of heated debate even in the most developed nations Against Death penalty. The essence of American criminal justice system is that “partisan advocacy of both sides on a case will promote the ultimate objective that the guilty be convicted and the innocent go free” (Ferdic et al, p)
Against The Death Penalty Essay - Words | Bartleby
This sample is NOT ORIGINAL. He also pointed out that a record number of 56 murderers were executed in alone, and many of the people in America and the Supreme Court believe that executions are appropriate punishment for certain criminals committing specific crimes Sharp. Capital punishment is a controversial topic all over the world because death penalty essays against the immense value associated with human life.
No science or technology has so far succeeded in creating an artificial life form in a laboratory setup. We have already succeeded in gathering useful information about even the distant planets in and out of the solar system; but still our knowledge about the origin of life, architecture of the life, life before birth and life after death etc are very limited.
Proponents of capital punishment argue that instead of giving capital punishment, keeping the hardcore criminals in prison for a lifelong period is highly expensive and meaningless. In my opinion, considering the value and mysteries surrounding human life, death penalty essays against, capital punishment is unethical or immoral, death penalty essays against.
Criminal justice systems in most of the countries believe that even if thousands of criminals escaped, no innocent people should be punished under any circumstances. We have lot of examples in which innocent people forced to accept punishments because of the circumstantial evidences collected against them by the law enforcement agencies. We should remember the story of one of the greatest philosophers of all time, Socrates, who forced to accept capital punishment since he tried to teach the word, the truth.
In other words, the existing criminal justice laws are not perfect and the loopholes may take the life of even innocent people. Life is the most precious thing in this world and once it is finished, no death penalty essays against or technology can regain it.
In short, considering the possibility of human error in judgements, capital punishment should be avoided under all circumstances. Judiciary always declare a person as innocent or criminal based on evidences collected by the law enforcement agencies. But it is quite possible that the law enforcement agency may fabricate evidences against the culprit in their thirst to prove their credentials and achieve fame.
Many people believe that most of the evidences collected against the former Iraqi president Saddam Husain were fabricated ones and the criminal judicial system executed him because of the immense pressure exerted by America. Extensive and comprehensive trails are required before giving capital punishment to a person.
These trial processes are lengthy, time consuming and expensive compared to other cases. Evidences from eye witnesses, death penalty essays against, forensic testing, death penalty essays against, and the services of expert advocates etc are necessary before the court taking their ultimate decisions against the criminal. In short, the expenses required to give a person capital punishment is more than the expenses needed to keep him in jail for his life term.
In a civilized society like ours death penalty essays against punishment is a barbarian act. Only the creator has the right to take or modify life of his creations. Since we are unable to create a life, we have no moral right to take a life. This world is not belonging to us.
Even the strongest, powerful, influential or the wealthy person will leave this world one day, taking nothing in his hand. In other what we have in this world are only some illusions. We are only the temporary custodians of our properties. The properties in this world belong to the creator and only he has the authority to do whatever he wants with his property.
Human life belongs to the property of the creator and we have no authority over it. Capital punishment means taking the life of a person before the time of his natural death. Even though science has answer to the question about the life before birth and after death, religions have. Laws of science believe that energy can neither be created nor be destroyed. At the death penalty essays against time it can be transformed from one form to another, death penalty essays against.
It is logical to believe that our soul or spirit is the energy form which drives our body and mind, death penalty essays against. Without soul, spirit or life, body is dysfunctional or dead. If that is true, it is impossible for us to destroy the soul since it is an energy form, even if we would be able to destroy the body.
In other words, as long as science is unable to unveil the mysteries surrounding life and death, it is better to accept the religious beliefs and principles about life and death.
No religion advocates the capital punishment under any circumstances and hence it should be avoided. The death penalty essays against has certain plans about our lives in this word and it is ethical to allow the creator to execute his plans.
Most of the criminals forced to commit crimes only because of the momentary lapse in controlling their emotions. It is unethical to take their lives for such a momentary emotional outburst. As we have not many ideas about the life before birth or after death, it is unwise to take the life of a person in the name of capital punishment.
Life is so precious and science has no death penalty essays against at all about the life architecture. There is no point in taking the life of a person for saving life of others when options are available save the life of all. University of Alaska Anchorage, Justice Centre, death penalty essays against.
Sharp D, death penalty essays against. Against Death penalty. March 13, Accessed 19 May, death penalty essays against, Essay Samples Death Penalty Essays Against Death penalty. Death Penalty. Struggling with your HW? Get your assignments done by real pros. Save your precious time and boost your marks with ease. Just fill in your HW requirements and you can count on us! Order your HW now. Used our essay samples for inspiration?
For more help, tap into our pool of professional writers and get expert essay editing services! Edit my Essay. Life is Precious.
Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life. The Death Death penalty essays against — An American History. Is Death Penalty Effective? Find Free Essays. We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling.
Popular Topics. A Rose for Emily American Dream Animal Rights Argumentative Civil War Cold War Compare and Contrast Cyberbullying Death Penalty Educational Goals Family George Washington Great Depression Great Gatsby Gun Control Homelessness Imperialism Macbeth Management Marijuana Legislation Martin Luther King Minimum Wage Nature vs Nurture Overpopulation Persuasive Police Brutality Romeo and Juliet Rose Parks School Uniform Slavery Stress Teenage Pregnancy The Story of an Hour Water Pollution Who Am I.
Copy to Clipboard.
Jordan Peterson - The Death Penalty
, time: 3:51Essay: Arguments against the Death Penalty | SchoolWorkHelper
Argument Against the Death Penalty Life is sacred. This is an ideal that the majority of people can agree upon to a certain extent. For this reason taking the life of another has always been considered the most deplorable of crimes, one worthy of the harshest available punishment The title is Arguments against the Death Penalty yet the author spent the whole time counterclaiming any arguments brought up rather than explaining the logistics behind the arguments. No side was taken in this essay however the title clearly states that the essay should be on arguments against 4 rows · 21/3/ · Against the Death Penalty Essay; Against the Death Penalty Essay. 21 Mar, Free
No comments:
Post a Comment